Medea

REAL MEAN CRITTER

MEDEA

1969

 5254_5

In White Trash the historian Nancy Isenberg writes about social class in the United States. Somewhere in the book she mentions a Hollywood film that used authentic working class people from the rural south. The director wanted to be realistic. When the producer saw the hillbillies, he had them replaced with actors. Not because the hillbillies were required to act and failed. The producers thought that the unkempt appearance of these deprived people would disturb and repel American cinema audiences. No doubt Pier Paolo Pasolini had his production problems but his films are distinguished by the presence of the poor labourers of southern Italy.  The rural poor may have bad teeth and wrinkles but Pasolini needed them for his pastoral vision. In the introduction to Medea the centaur proclaims that ‘there is nothing natural in the natural world’. There is no reason to believe that a centaur understands the natural world but he has a point. What exists and what we ignore are wonder and mystery. Our true inheritance is a planet complicated by billions of years of history. That environmental change was not designed. What happened to the oceans and the land before industrialisation was both inevitable and authentic. Pasolini argued that this magic and wonder could only be appreciated by humans unspoilt by modern society and crass capitalism. His centaur reveals that the corruption began before industrialisation. He claims that everything is sacred but holiness is a curse. This we realise is how the hierarchy began. We surrendered to people who had no idea of what made us blessed but who could impose discipline and pretend it was piety.

Medea is a visual feast. The landscape and costumes are fabulous and exotic but Pasolini does not ask his audience to admire his imagination. Compared to Medea the designs in modern movies, although often impressive, feel like excess decoration intended merely to add inconsequential distinction. In the tribal community imagined by Pasolini theatre and performance are not something that exist as separate entities. Together they are an essence that was tasted in everyday existence. Pasolini was a Marxist. He bought the dialectic version of history and believed in his own didactic responsibilities. The exotic imagery in Medea is a reminder that history books or trips to monuments can inform but they will never reveal the splendour of the past. Life and people were different then.

PisaMiracoli

The main plot in Medea begins with the sacrifice of a young man. His head and limbs are removed. His blood is shared amongst the people in his community. They all take a couple of sips. The blood is then used to fertilise the ground and invoke a good harvest. As the great bluesman B B King almost said, we are talking about the primitive here, don’t you know? The narrative that follows in Medea is fanciful but simple. In the original play by Euripides all the scenes were two handers, Medea talking to someone else. It may have been this dialectical construction that attracted Pasolini to the play. Euripides emphasises the clashes between Medea and others. Pasolini retains some of the personal conflict but he also compares societies as well as individuals. As well as being betrayed by Jason, Medea is also a victim of history and the imperial ambition of Jason and his followers. Medea resists and fights the intruders. Her resistance, though, does not translate into heroism. Instead the actions of Medea make her corrupt, and she loses human feeling.

Medea lives on Colchis, an island that has primitive rituals. Despite fathering her three children Jason abandons her for the daughter of the King Of Corinth. The daughter is younger, and Corinth is a more advanced and materialistic civilisation. Before the film is finished Medea will have killed her brother, her own three children and caused the death of the King of Corinth and his daughter. There are two cinematic versions of Medea that are important. In 1988 Lars Von Trier filmed a script by the great ascetic aesthetic Carl Dryer. The version taken from the Dryer script emphasises the personal tragedy, the impact of betrayal and the need for revenge and to have the last word against an enemy that was once loved. Dryer also had his polemical moments and he could be critical of the attitudes of authority but he was no leftie. If Dryer adds a modern perspective, it is Freudian rather than Marxist. For Pasolini the tragedy of Medea includes not just the loss of a love but also seeing her world and the primitivism that gave her power and worth being destroyed. Although Medea uses her magic to destroy the woman that Jason wants to marry, her actions require a visit from her dead father to convince Medea that she can still be destructive, magical and potent. Medea has her vengeance but she is reduced, as is her world. The violence that she had known before Jason was not wilful aggression but acts that honoured her land, gods and existence. The final scene confirms what we suspected from the beginning.  Medea and Jason and their two different worlds are lost to each other, separated by an uncontrollable fire. This violence is not part of a narrow ritual but wanton and out of control.

tumblr_ns9frjzYmC1rql6ico5_1280

The motives of Medea are vindictive and inspired by a hatred of Jason and a physical connection that cannot be destroyed.  She also realises that because of the alternative world of Corinth and its seduction of Jason there is no place for her children to now exist. Or in other words Pasolini has his ideological cake and eats it. This fusion between what could be two opposing interpretations of not just the play by Euripides but human nature is what makes the Pasolini version of Medea fabulous and a classic movie. Since the play by Euripides we have had the modern world and urban discontent when the poor have destroyed the homes of their neighbours and the prospects for their children. It might hurt but it is a way of denying a conquering world the expected triumph.

Patat-Bedin-Image-2

Pasolini chose Maria Callas to play Medea.  Photographs of them working together and enjoying the company of each other still exist. The opportunity for them to discuss Marxist theory would have been limited. Callas was a jet-setter and she enjoyed the company of the rich. Pasolini, though, did not seek friends amongst those on the left. The Italian Communist Party expelled him in 1949.  In 1969, when students and the police faced each other across the barricades, Pasolini sympathised with the police. He said the policemen were poor folk doing a job for people who told them lies. Pasolini described the students as left wing fascists. The man has to be given credit for prescience.  In Britain most of those students welcomed Thatcher and neoliberalism. They were also seduced by the technology that Pasolini felt was destroying human experience. Today it is difficult for young people to understand the vehemence many in the 60s felt for the modern technological world. Something happened and, rather than think about history and what may have been lost, people turned to geography and looked at the poorer parts of the world. If that was the past, they were not interested. In 1969, though, people like Pasolini remembered abandoned community and a natural world that was being treated with contempt. At the end of the film we hear Medea scream that it is hopeless now. What was lost cannot be reclaimed and that applies to the natural world, Medea and us.

Callas is good as Medea. Her iconic status, celebrity and strong facial features make her an imposing presence. She is believable as the powerful wronged woman. The clash between her and Jason has to have consequence. The behaviour of Royalty to each other through the centuries has been often violent and appalling. This is how rulers operate when their power and status are at stake.

FF42-20

There are fine moments in Medea.  Neither the landscape nor the music has anything to do with Greece but together they persuade us that we are watching and hearing an unknowable world. The villagers chase Jason off the island. This is marvellous, as is the sea journey when we see a bored Jason being anything but impressive.   Medea kills her brother, and in the legend and the play this makes sense but in the film the point of the slaying is lost. The murder of the three children, though, is very effective. Medea loves these children. She cannot see a future for her or them.  Anger has been replaced by resignation. Unable to nurture she is obliged to destroy.

pasolini_callas_medea-1024x682

Pasolini was murdered when he was 53 years old. The initial reaction was that it happened because of his gay sex life. He was, though, killed by a violent gang. They may have been gangsters or right wing fanatics who objected to his politics.   By the time of his death Pasolini had become celibate. Pasolini had said that modern man did not appeal to him. They smell different, he said. He meant from how they should smell. His most popular films were based on bawdy and historical tales. They made him money but also provided some therapy. Pasolini was able to imagine people as he thought they should be – lusty, unashamed, a little smelly and not bored by comfort and relentless indulgence, people able to go outside and fill their nostrils with fresh air.

Howard Jackson has had six books published by Red Rattle Books including novels, short stories and Horror Pickers, a collection of film criticism.   If you are interested in original horror and crime fiction and want information about the books of Howard Jackson and the other great titles at Red Rattle Books, click here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

An A-Z Journey Around Britain

16 Edinburgh

 Arthurs-seat-edinburgh_54_990x660_201406020152

Life has existed around Edinburgh since 8500 BC. In the 5th Century BC the Greeks had created civilisation, democracy and the theatrical masterpiece, Medea. When the Romans arrived in Edinburgh in 638 AD, the Scottish were still on a 2000 year journey to discover Andy Stewart and Donald Where’s Your Trousers.

Edinburgh is not the largest industrial city. It has the second largest financial centre in the UK, the highest percentage of professionals in its population, four universities and, thanks to Blackwell, a decent publishing industry. Edinburgh is refined.

I almost had a honeymoon in Edinburgh. It consisted of two bus trips to the Capital from nearby Bathgate.   My wife and me drank in the Victorian bar Cafe Royal and had to endure self-satisfied folk music. The bar still exists and is worth a visit. There is plenty of good beer in Edinburgh but the bar, Ushers, is reliable.

When I was young, I disliked the snob appeal of Edinburgh but now the City always makes me want to stay longer. It exists as a reminder of how life used to feel before Thatcher came to power. People want culture as much as they do money. The Festival may be burdened with the weird and mediocre but it is a positive force, and Edinburgh is great for theatre, cinema and bookshops. The horror story of modern consumerism is hidden in retreats called malls, all located outside the city.

No doubt, the romance of Edinburgh consists of deceit and illusion. The Old Town that now defines the best urban panorama in Britain was a residential and public health disaster before the New Town was built in the 18th Century. The novel Trainspotting and its heroin addicted heroes lived in the suburb Leith. The cultural and educational achievement of Edinburgh has added prestige to the Scottish nation and produced icons like David Hume and Robert Louis Stevenson. The underclass of Edinburgh, though, is brutal and destructive. Despite the desire to shock, Trainspotting somehow shares the smug superiority of the refined that it condemns. But, although semi-literate, it deserves its status as a cult novel.  Hume argued that morality and conduct was rooted in passion and sentiment and not reasoning. If he ever reads Trainspotting, he may change his mind.

Modern analysts have insisted that the view of Scotland as left wing and communal is wrong. So the sense of pre-Thatcher order that I experienced on Princess Street might have been sentimentality. Perhaps but those who have doubts about the distinction between Scotland and England should watch coverage of the civilised Scottish Parliament. Lacking English class warfare and the imitations of boorish aristocratic conquerors, their rational debates are as remote from the House of Commons as 5th Century Greece was from 1st Century AD Scotland.

91.7% of the population of Edinburgh is white. This compares to 96% in the rest of Scotland and is a pleasant feature in a Capital where, I hope, Social Democracy is still supported. The Islamic population worships in the Edinburgh Central Mosque.

al-fresco-dining-victoria-street-edinburgh

Scotland is not noted for fine food but Edinburgh is the exception. A night out in Edinburgh is as expensive as London but size and attitude are important and Edinburgh has the advantage in both.

 

Next week, idols and disillusionment, Falkirk.

Howard Jackson has had three books published by Red Rattle Books. His 11,000 mile journey around Brazil is described in Innocent Mosquitoes. His next book is a compilation of horror stories and is called Nightmares Ahead. It will be available very soon this Spring.

If you want to read more about his travels click here.